Sample Essay of Gerald Gault Case

Sample Essay of Gerald Gault CaseThere are many samples that you can find on the internet that describe the Gerald Gault case. To get a complete understanding of the case, I will be describing each component. In doing so, you will be able to come up with your own conclusions as to why the case was dropped.The first and probably the most important component of the case are the DNA samples that were collected and analyzed by the Gardendale Police Department and the Gault County Sheriff's Department. All DNA evidence is supposed to be tested by a known national laboratory and results should be published within six months. However, after a couple of months, this process is delayed for 'missing evidence' cases. This means that any results from those samples are not public knowledge and cannot be used as evidence in a court of law.During that time, the Gardendale Police Department and the Gault County Sheriff's Department only test a small portion of the DNA samples and they often keep tho se samples hidden from the general public. This leaves the case forever shrouded in mystery. The first reason for this is that it may mean that the officer(s) responsible for the crime are still on the loose and second reason is that it's better to have some mystery than to let the case go unsolved for too long.The case was entered into the Circuit Court of Franklin County and a writ of mandate was served on the Gault County Sheriff's Department. After having the writ served, the defendant was served by the clerk of the Circuit Court and went to trial. There were two women who testified on behalf of the defendant, only one of whom would ever be called as a witness.Prior to this point, the pro se litigant filed a motion to dismiss based on a violation of due process because it was more likely that the jury would determine that the pro se litigant was afraid than an honest person. After some time has passed, the pro se litigant will lose the ability to file a motion to dismiss based o n due process violations. The court allowed the motion to be dismissed on the grounds that the evidence had been introduced into evidence without proper notice of the DNA sample testing process, that there was a conflict of interest, and that there was not sufficient evidence to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.The forensics analyst's report stated that the analysis performed on the DNA did not meet the minimum statistical requirements of the National Forensic Science Program. In order to receive the CSI certification, the DNA analysis needs to meet certain standards and the results of the DNA analysis need to be reported to the defense immediately. The DNA analyst said that the DNA sample wasn't tested for more than one hundred times and the analyst didn't collect the DNA until after all other experts had completed their analysis.A second forensic science expert also testified that the law enforcement officers failed to follow the rules regarding data collection and that t he methods used to collect the DNA were inappropriate for use in criminal cases. The FBI was called in and commented that the techniques used to collect the DNA were consistent with what was recommended by the National Forensic Science Program.The case was lost and the evidence was destroyed, not to mention that the test results were never released to the defense. The jury was never informed that the defense was allowed to obtain the test results and it was only after the case was closed that the defence learned of the problems. A sample essay of Gerald Gault case can be found at the link below.